Severity
Moderate
ModerateActive
CPSC recall · Reported December 3, 2015
Cost Plus World Market Recalls Reading Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard to the user.
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial team.
Verify with CPSC →
Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif. recalled This recall involves high-back upholstered reading chairs sold in a black and white flora… - a moderate-severity action.
Cost Plus World Market Recalls Reading Chairs Due to Fall Hazard was recalled by Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif. in December 3, 2015. Reason: The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard…. Remedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and inspect the front legs fo…. Verify recall #16052 with the CPSC before acting.
The recall
Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif. issued this moderate-severity CPSC recall-The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard….
- Moderate
- severity level
- December 3, 2015
- reported
Sourced from official CPSC enforcement records. Verify recall #16052 with the agency before acting. Full product description, hazard, remedy, and related recalls are below.
Recall Insight
This CPSC action (record #16052) was formally reported on December 3, 2015. It is classified under Moderate severity, with a current status of Active. Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif. is listed as the recalling firm. Federal records list the affected scope as About 2,700.
The documented reason for this recall is: The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard to the user. Distribution information was not included in the agency filing, so consumers should assume broad potential exposure until the firm publishes point-of-sale details. The remedy documented by the agency is: Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and inspect the front legs for support blocks. Chairs without support blocks can be returned to any Cost Plus World Market for a free excha… - consumers holding this product should act on that instruction rather than relying on general guidance.
Within the same product category the archive holds 6 closely related recalls, 6 from CPSC - clustering in a narrow category often points to a systemic quality-control or supplier issue rather than a one-off defect. Always verify the recall number against the official agency record before acting.
Household Products recalls over time
Where this recall sits in its category - 3,056 household products recalls on record
Of 101,704 recalls in the database, 24,878 are high severity, 72,426 moderate, and 4,400 low. This recall is classified moderate severity.
Counts reflect market size and reporting activity, not inherent danger, we do not rank products by risk from raw recall volume.
Affected scope
About 2,700
Related Recalls
6
6 from same agency
Product description
This recall involves high-back upholstered reading chairs sold in a black and white floral print. The chairs are 37 inches tall by 30 inches wide, and have four wooden legs with the front two on casters. SKU number 473747 is printed on a UPC sticker affixed to the underside of the chair.
Reason for recall
The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard to the user.
Remedy, what to do
Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and inspect the front legs for support blocks. Chairs without support blocks can be returned to any Cost Plus World Market for a free exchange. Consumers should contact Cost Plus World Market or log onto www.worldmarket.com for instructions on how to inspect the chair legs for support blocks.
Recall Profile
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Agency | U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission |
| Severity class | Moderate |
| Status | Active |
| Recall number | 16052 |
| Date reported | December 3, 2015 |
| Date initiated | December 3, 2015 |
| Recalling firm | Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif. |
| Affected scope | About 2,700 |
| Distribution | Not disclosed |
| Official source | CPSC notice → |
Profile values are sourced directly from the official CPSC enforcement record. Source: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
What to do with this recall
Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and inspect the front legs for support blocks. Chairs without support…
- Check the recall number (16052) and product description against the item you own. Search the archive
- Confirm the current status and remedy on the official CPSC notice before acting. CPSC notice
- Follow the documented remedy (refund, replacement, repair, or disposal) rather than general advice. What to do next
This page summarizes the official CPSC record for research and awareness; it is not legal, medical, or safety advice. Verify with the issuing agency before acting.
Frequently Asked Questions
What product was recalled? ▼
This recall involves high-back upholstered reading chairs sold in a black and white floral print. The chairs are 37 inches tall by 30 inches wide, and have four wooden legs with the front two on casters. SKU number 473747 is printed on a UPC sticker affixed to the underside of the chair.. Recalled by Cost Plus Management Services Inc., of Oakland, Calif.. Units affected: About 2,700.
Why was this product recalled? ▼
The front leg on reading chairs sold without front leg support blocks can bend or break, posing a fall hazard to the user.
What should consumers do? ▼
Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled chairs and inspect the front legs for support blocks. Chairs without support blocks can be returned to any Cost Plus World Market for a free exchange. Consumers should contact Cost Plus World Market or log onto www.worldmarket.com for instructions on how to inspect the chair legs for support blocks.
Which agency issued this recall? ▼
This recall was issued by the CPSC on December 3, 2015. Severity: Moderate. Recall number: 16052.
How do I check if my product is affected by a recall? ▼
Check the product description and recall number (16052) against your product. Visit the official CPSC website for the most current information. You can also use our Recall Checker tool to search by product name or brand.
How do I report an injury from a recalled product? ▼
Report injuries to the issuing agency: CPSC at SaferProducts.gov, NHTSA at nhtsa.gov/report-a-safety-problem, or FDA via MedWatch. Document the product (photos, model/serial numbers, purchase receipts) and seek medical attention. Injury reports help agencies track hazard patterns and may strengthen enforcement actions.
Nearby Recalls in This Category
Other recalls in the same product category, useful for spotting patterns across the same defect class or manufacturer.
CPSC Moderate
Cooper Lighting Recalls Metalux Optimized High Bay LED Light Fixtures Due to Fire Hazard
Cooper Lighting, LLC, of Peachtree City, Georgia · 2026-07-02
CPSC Moderate
Winco Fireworks International Recalls Roman Candles 8 Shot Fireworks Due to Risk of Serious Injury from Explosion and B…
· 2026-07-02
CPSC Moderate
Winco Fireworks International Recalls Unity 7 Shot 200 Gram Aerial Cake Fireworks Due to Risk of Serious Injury from Ex…
· 2026-07-02
CPSC Moderate
Kith Retail Recalls Children's Loungewear Sets Due to Risk of Serious Injury from Burn Hazard; Violate Mandatory Standa…
· 2026-06-25
CPSC Moderate
Southern Telecom Expands Recall of Lomi Waxing Kits Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Fire and Burn Hazards; …
· 2026-06-25
Compare this recall with Cooper Lighting Recalls Metalux Optimized High Bay LED Ligh… →
Every figure on PlainRecalls is rendered directly from official FDA, CPSC and NHTSA recall records, no number is typed in by an editor. This recall: CPSC, reported December 3, 2015. Severity classes follow each agency's own taxonomy (FDA Class I/II/III; CPSC and NHTSA by hazard type), and related-recall context is computed across the full archive. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.