Severity
Moderate
FDA Devices recall · Reported February 18, 2015
Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Left. The appropriate articles were actually included in the s…
Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division recalled MEDPOR TITAN MAX Orbital Floor and Wall (OFW) MEDPOR-Titanium-Barrier (MTB) Right Prod… — a moderate-severity action.
MEDPOR TITAN MAX Orbital Floor and Wall (OFW) MEDPOR-Titanium-Barrier (MTB) Right Prod… was recalled by Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division in February 18, 2015. Reason: Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW …. Check the official notice for the remedy. Verify recall #Z-1093-2015 with the FDA Devices before acting.
The recall
Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division issued this moderate-severity FDA Devices recall — Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW ….
Sourced from official FDA Devices enforcement records. Verify recall #Z-1093-2015 with the agency before acting. Full product description, hazard, remedy, and related recalls are below.
This FDA Devices action (record #Z-1093-2015) was formally reported on February 18, 2015, with the manufacturer initiating the action on December 17, 2014. It is classified under Moderate severity (Class II), with a current status of Terminated. Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division is listed as the recalling firm, operating out of Portage, MI. Federal records list the affected scope as 1051.
The documented reason for this recall is: Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Left. The appropriate articles were actually included in the shipment. However, the products had an in… Distribution data in the federal record shows the product reached: Worldwide Distribution - US Nationwide in the states of PA, KY, VA, CT, UT, MD, AR, FL, TX, AL, DE, IL, IA, MI, CO, OH, GA, CA, DC, MO, LA, WI, ID, SC, NC, NY, MA, NH, CA, OK, MN, KY, IN, OR, TN and the countries of: Ar…. Distribution scope directly affects the consumer exposure window and determines whether a recall remains regional or escalates into a nationwide advisory.
Within the same product category the archive holds 6 closely related recalls, 6 from FDA Devices — clustering in a narrow category often points to a systemic quality-control or supplier issue rather than a one-off defect. Always verify the recall number against the official agency record before acting.
Where this recall sits in its category — 40,409 medical devices recalls on record
Of 100,165 recalls in the database, 23,668 are high severity, 72,097 moderate, and 4,400 low. This recall is classified moderate severity.
Counts reflect market size and reporting activity, not inherent danger — we do not rank products by risk from raw recall volume.
Severity
Moderate
Affected scope
1051
Related Recalls
6
6 from same agency
MEDPOR TITAN MAX Orbital Floor and Wall (OFW) MEDPOR-Titanium-Barrier (MTB) Right Product Usage: MEDPOR Implants in block, sheet and pre-formed shapes are intended for non-weight-bearing applications of craniofacial reconstruction/cosmetic surgery and repair of craniofacial trauma. MEDPOR Surgical Implants and MEDPOR BARRIER Implants are intended for the augmentation or restoration of bony contour in the craniofacial skeleton.
Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Left. The appropriate articles were actually included in the shipment. However, the products had an incorrect barrier location.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Agency | U.S. Food and Drug Administration |
| Severity class | Moderate (Class II) |
| Status | Terminated |
| Recall number | Z-1093-2015 |
| Date reported | February 18, 2015 |
| Date initiated | December 17, 2014 |
| Recalling firm | Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division |
| Firm location | Portage, MI |
| Affected scope | 1051 |
| Distribution | Worldwide Distribution - US Nationwide in the states of PA, KY, VA, CT, UT, MD, AR, FL, TX, AL, DE, IL, IA, MI, CO, OH, GA, CA, DC, MO, LA, WI, ID, SC, NC, NY, MA, NH, CA, OK, MN, KY, IN, OR, TN and the countries of: Argentina, Australia, … |
Profile values are sourced directly from the official FDA Devices enforcement record. Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
What to do with this recall
Match your product against the recall record, then act on the agency remedy.
This page summarizes the official FDA Devices record for research and awareness; it is not legal, medical, or safety advice. Verify with the issuing agency before acting.
Keep tracking product safety across the federal recall archive.
Recall Checker
Search the full archive by product name, brand, or recall number across every agency.
Check a product →
FDA Devices recalls
Every recall issued by FDA Devices, newest first.
Browse the feed →
RecallRadar
Live feed of the latest recalls across the FDA, CPSC and NHTSA — filter by agency and severity.
View the live feed →
Rankings
The largest recalls by units affected and the most-recalled product categories.
See the rankings →
Browse by category
Find recalls by product type to spot recurring defect patterns.
All categories →
What to do next
A step-by-step guide to refunds, repairs, and returns after a recall.
Read the guide →
Other recalls in the same product category — useful for spotting patterns across the same defect class or manufacturer.
GE Medical Systems Information Technologies Inc · 2026-06-03
Medline Industries, LP · 2026-06-03
Medline Industries, LP · 2026-06-03
Abiomed, Inc. · 2026-06-03
GE Medical Systems Information Technologies Inc · 2026-06-03
Compare this recall with GE HealthCare TRADE IN CARESCAPE TELEMETRY SERVER ARK-2250L… →
Source: FDA, CPSC, and NHTSA federal recall databases. This recall: FDA Devices, reported February 18, 2015.
Recall information is sourced from official federal agency databases. Always verify recall details with the issuing agency for the most current status. This information is for research and awareness purposes only.
Every figure on PlainRecalls is rendered directly from official FDA, CPSC and NHTSA recall records — no number is typed in by an editor. Severity classes follow each agency's own taxonomy (FDA Class I/II/III; CPSC and NHTSA by hazard type), and related-recall context is computed across the full archive. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.